How to get more fps in csgo pookie how to#

It just tries to take the best of both worlds. Now, LimitedSharpen() doesn't re-invent the wheel. Since we never know that, we can only search for compromises that work sufficiently good in most cases. To make an 'optimal' sharpness restauration or enhancement, one would need to know the exact process that did reduce the source's sharpness. Note: Discussion about 'ideal sharpening' is lengthy. Obviously, both methods have their pro's, and both have their con's. Red is (basically) the result of sharpen() or UnsharpMask(), pink is the result of XSharpen(). The blue line represents the original edge, the dark side on the left, the bright side on the right, and in-between the gradient that builds 'the edge'. Let's have a look at a simple transition from dark to bright, and what our standard sharpeners will do to it:

So one has either to reduce the percentage, thereby weakening the overall effect, or to work with big supersampling, which makes it both extremely slow and less effective. By the nature of the method, XSharpen produces edges with maximal possible aliasing (jaggyness). XSharpen, being a non-linear sharpener, replaces each pixel with either its darkest or brightest neighbor, depending on which is nearer in range. The results (something like 'per-pixel contrast enhancement') are good as long as the strength is kept low enough. Traditional sharpeners like sharpen() or UnsharpMask() compare each pixel against the average of its neighborhood, and emphasize the difference between them. What's the problem with 'normal' sharpening?

How to get more fps in csgo pookie how to#

And by chaining several instances, it can even be used for something like a ' poor man's deconvolution' - but only if one knows how to battle the noise ) It can be used as a replacement for the common 'resize(x4)-XSharpen-resize(x1)' combo, with very similar results (perhaps even better) - but at least 2 times faster, since it requires much less oversampling. LimitedSharpen() can be used like a traditional sharpener, but producing much less artefacts. Time to make an own, proper thread in Avisynth Usage for this little function. but by now, I think it has reached a status where it is working quite nice and sufficiently fast, and has (most) of the features it's supposed to have. It's been around for a while now, a little wild at times, in several different versions regarding features and so. The thread turned into a little idea bin (and is still open for that purpose ) ), and one of the breed's results is the function

Time ago, I started a thread in the Development section about 'thresholded sharpening'. Since for me this is a rather seldom event, I thought I could at least make a usable and halfway worthy one, instead of doing only small talk in other places.